Some years ago, I wrote a commissioned article for a peer-reviewed compendium, entitled “Can We Say What Diet is Best for Health?”

The “anti-diet” movement, we are told- specifically by The Washington Post and The Examination- began with good intentions.

We speak, in Preventive Medicine, of “teachable moments,” those at-best occasional windows of influence that feed our frail, feathered hope.

Imagine a world- perhaps much like this one- where, in the beginning, there was no air pollution- and then there was some.

Any good scientist is always seeking to answer questions, and willing to question answers.

Dylan Thomas famously advised us- or at least his father, and us by proxy- to rage against the dying of the light.

As the dairy debate continues, it is crucial to critically examine research findings and avoid falling for sensationalized headlines.

Concerns have been raised due to reported cases of stomach paralysis from Ozempic, despite its effectiveness in managing diabetes.

In a recent interview I was pressed on the topic of protein for overall vitality, for peak physical performance, for satiety and weight control.

A newly published paper in The Lancet Planetary Health challenges the merits of the EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet, a template for how to feed all of us hungry humans well while sustaining a viable planet, too.